Evidence at a glance
- Evidence level
- Multiple levels: official guidance, building science, growing sensor evidence and project hypotheses.
- Application type
- Evidence-based recommendation, project targets and site-specific validation.
- Published or updated
- Updated 29 July 2026
- What this did not prove
- A sensor reading does not prove healthy air or absence of hidden mould; one target does not guarantee an outcome.
Indoor environment and moisture
Environmental measurements describe building conditions. They do not diagnose health, prove the absence of hidden mould or establish that a residence has healthy air.
A tropical operating problem
A residence can look dry, smell clean and still be carrying moisture or pollutants.
Bali residences often combine high outdoor humidity, open-air living, split AC, wet rooms, staff cooking, laundry, closed wardrobes, intermittent occupation and long periods of owner absence.
Each condition may be manageable alone. Together they create room-specific risks that cannot be resolved by a purifier, a thermostat or one green dashboard score.
The right question is not whether the house has sensors. It is whether sources are controlled, wet zones dry, outdoor air is intentional, filters can be serviced, condensate drains correctly and the operating team knows what to do when conditions drift.
Order matters
Control the cause before interpreting the sensor.
Step 01, Reduce or isolate the source
Resolve water entry, wet construction, combustion, cooking emissions, fragranced products, poor drainage, condensate faults and other avoidable sources before adding treatment equipment.
Step 02, Extract where the source occurs
Kitchen, bathroom and laundry loads should be removed close to the source, with a realistic makeup-air path and a dry-down period the staff can operate.
Step 03, Manage outdoor air and moisture
Outdoor air is beneficial only when the outdoor condition, rain, noise, insects and occupancy make it appropriate. Closed rooms need an intentional ventilation and moisture strategy rather than recirculated cooling alone.
Step 04, Filter for a defined question
Particle filtration can reduce particle exposure when the system is sealed, sized, operated and maintained correctly. It does not remove moisture, carbon dioxide, hidden mould or every gas.
Step 05, Monitor trends and act
Sensors support diagnosis, alerts and retuning. They do not replace design, maintenance, professional investigation or a clear response protocol.
Evidence map
The evidence is strongest where moisture, pollution and ventilation are treated as separate questions.
Dampness and mould
Evidence level
Established evidence
Persistent dampness, moisture damage, visible mould and musty odour require prevention, investigation and remediation. There is no single consumer sensor value that proves a building is free of hidden mould.
Fine particles and combustion
Evidence level
Established evidence
Outdoor infiltration, cooking, smoking, incense, candles, generators and other combustion sources can raise particle or gas exposure. Source control and effective local extraction come before decorative air-cleaning claims.
Ventilation and carbon dioxide
Evidence level
Growing evidence
Measured carbon dioxide can support a ventilation question in regularly occupied, well-mixed rooms when people are the dominant source. It is not a complete indoor-air metric and does not measure particles, VOCs, mould, moisture, carbon monoxide or nitrogen dioxide.
Filtration and portable cleaners
Evidence level
Established for particle reduction, application-specific for room outcome
Sealed filtration and correctly selected portable cleaners can reduce airborne particles. Their effect depends on airflow, room size, placement, runtime, filter condition and the source. They do not repair a wet substrate or replace outdoor air and extraction.
Occupied and vacant operation
Evidence level
Evidence-based recommendation with site validation
A second home cannot be treated as safe simply because it is empty. Humidity, drains, leaks, stored contents, filter condition and power recovery need an absence mode and an inspection routine.
Bali translation
Open and closed are conditions, not identities.
Open mode
Used when outdoor humidity, particles, rain, noise and insects are acceptable for the intended space and activity.
Mixed mode
Uses selected openings, fans and limited mechanical systems without allowing contradictory states or uncontrolled humid-air entry.
Closed mode
Uses intentional outdoor air, extraction, filtration, cooling and moisture control for protected rooms or unfavourable outdoor conditions.
Absence mode
Maintains defined environmental and asset-protection conditions, leak awareness, drain and trap checks, equipment operation and a clear staff inspection routine.
Extreme-weather or disruption mode
Defines the safe response to intense rain, smoke, poor outdoor air, power interruption, equipment fault or delayed maintenance.
The whole house is not one air zone
Different rooms fail for different reasons.
Protected bedrooms
Overnight occupancy, closed doors, quiet operation, bathroom adjacency and long exposure make ventilation, humidity, noise and control especially important.
Walk-in wardrobes and owner storage
Packed contents, low airflow, perimeter walls and long vacancy can hide moisture damage before it becomes visible in the room.
Bathrooms and powder rooms
Steam, slow dry-down, low extraction, wet finishes and empty traps require defined airflow and operating routines.
Kitchens
Cooking creates particles, moisture, odour and, where combustion is used, additional gases. The hood has to capture the real cooking process, not only exist in the drawing.
Laundry and utility
Wet textiles and closed service rooms add latent load and need extraction, drainage, leak control and staff rules.
Staff rooms and service spaces
Higher occupancy, closed doors and simplified equipment should not make staff accommodation the least ventilated part of the residence.
Plant, garage and generator adjacencies
Combustion, heat, vibration, pressure relationships and return-air paths need physical separation and life-safety review.
Interpreted measurement
A useful sensor has a defined question, a known limitation and an action attached to it.
Temperature and relative humidity
Useful for comfort, dew-point interpretation and moisture trends. A single relative-humidity snapshot is weak evidence without temperature, duration and room context.
Carbon dioxide
Useful as a ventilation proxy under defined conditions. It is not proof of overall air quality.
Fine particles
Useful for trends, outdoor infiltration, cooking events and filtration checks. Low-cost optical sensors require placement, humidity and calibration discipline.
Leak and material moisture
Useful for detecting water events or investigating substrates that air sensors cannot see.
Life-safety gases
Where combustion exists, certified life-safety devices and specialist design are separate from consumer environmental monitoring.
Response rule
Every monitored condition must have:
- a responsible person;
- an alert or review threshold defined for the project;
- a response action;
- an escalation path;
- a maintenance and calibration requirement;
- a record in the Building Passport.
From room risk to operation
The environmental strategy has to work with real cooking, bathing, vacancy and maintenance.
Verification sequence
- Map moisture and pollutant risks room by room.
- Define open, mixed, closed, absence and disruption modes.
- Confirm source-control, outdoor-air, extraction and filtration logic with appointed specialists.
- Review condensate, drainage, filter and service access before closure.
- Test airflow, extraction, controls and alarms before opening.
- Train staff on dry-down, filters, cleaning, vacancy and escalation.
- Review occupied and vacant trends.
- Retune after the first month and relevant season where included.
Evidence outputs
- room risk map;
- source-control register;
- operating-mode descriptions;
- MEP and specialist records;
- material and cleaning notes;
- airflow and extraction tests;
- temperature, RH and dew-point trends;
- ventilation-proxy and particle-trend records where justified;
- filter, drain and service-access photographs;
- staff training and corrective-action logs;
- Building Passport entries.
Limits
No single reading can certify the whole indoor environment.
A short monitoring period cannot establish full wet-season behaviour, hidden mould absence, pollutant attribution or long-term maintenance adherence. A purifier test does not prove ventilation. A low carbon-dioxide reading does not establish that particles, gases or moisture are controlled.
The page can explain risk, control hierarchy, measurement and project verification. It cannot label a residence healthy, toxin-free, allergen-free or mould-proof.
Prohibited public claims
- Healthy air
- Mould-proof
- Toxin-free
- Allergen-free
- Prevents respiratory illness
- CO2 proves good air quality
- A purifier replaces ventilation
- Plants purify the residence
Related Study Note
Indoor environment and moisture control in Bali residences
Related protocol
Indoor Environment and Moisture Control Protocol
Related theme
Thermal comfort in hot-humid residences
Before the MEP strategy hardens
Define how the residence will breathe, dry and remain protected when nobody is there.
DALLEAU Atelier carries the environmental question from room risk and owner use through specialist design, maintainability, commissioning, staff operation and seasonal learning.
Sources
The source finding and DALLEAU's residential interpretation are kept separate. Links open the original publisher or authority record.
- WHO global air quality guidelines
Authoritative guidance. Ambient pollutant benchmarks used as exposure context. Limit: A complete indoor residential specification or proof that an indoor environment is healthy.
- WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould
Authoritative guidance. Prevention and remediation of persistent dampness and microbial growth. Limit: A universal safe microbial threshold or proof that hidden mould is absent.
- WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants
Authoritative guidance. Pollutant-specific health context and source-control considerations. Limit: A complete residential specification or a single sensor score for indoor air quality.
- ASHRAE position document on limiting indoor mold and dampness in buildings
Authoritative guidance. Building moisture control and dampness prevention principles. Limit: A universal Bali project threshold or proof that a building is mould-free.
- ASHRAE position document on indoor carbon dioxide
Authoritative guidance. Use of indoor CO₂ as a limited ventilation indicator in context. Limit: Treating CO₂ as a complete indoor-air-quality or health score.
- Low-cost air pollution monitors and indoor air quality
Authoritative guidance. Capabilities and practical limits of lower-cost indoor monitors. Limit: Regulatory-grade accuracy, diagnosis or complete pollutant coverage.
- Enhanced Air Sensor Guidebook
Authoritative guidance. Planning, selecting and interpreting air-sensor measurements. Limit: Replacing calibrated professional instruments or inferring a medical outcome.